Main Page: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<h1> <font style="color:#B45F04" size="3"> '''This Month's Feature''' </font> </h1> | <h1> <font style="color:#B45F04" size="3"> '''This Month's Feature''' </font> </h1> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 30: | Line 29: | ||
<h1> <font style="color:#B45F04" size="3"> '''In The News''' </font> </h1> | <h1> <font style="color:#B45F04" size="3"> '''In The News''' </font> </h1> | ||
Supreme Court of Canada - Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development) <br> | |||
<br> | |||
On April 14th 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada declared that Métis and non-Status Indians are 'Indians' under s.91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867. The impact of this case on Red Sky Méits Independent Nation (RSMIN) is yet to be ascertained. This case has the potential to provide legal rights to the Métis as Aboriginal people and allows the Federal Government to deal directly with Métis communities. For more information, please visit our page [[Harry Daniels Court File]], or visit the website [http://rsmin.ca <font style="color:#5489EB"> Red Sky Métis Independent Nation™</font>]. | |||
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 19:56, 14 June 2016
|
This Month's Feature
Did You Know?
In The News
Supreme Court of Canada - Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)
On April 14th 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada declared that Métis and non-Status Indians are 'Indians' under s.91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867. The impact of this case on Red Sky Méits Independent Nation (RSMIN) is yet to be ascertained. This case has the potential to provide legal rights to the Métis as Aboriginal people and allows the Federal Government to deal directly with Métis communities. For more information, please visit our page Harry Daniels Court File, or visit the website Red Sky Métis Independent Nation™.